References

Following are the references cited in the various themes of the Findings of Landscape Quality Research.

Abello & Bernaldez, 1986, Landscape preference and personality. Landscape & Urban Plg, 13, 19- 28.

Abello, et al, 1986. Consensus and contrast components in landscape preference. Env. & Behav. 18:2, 155 – 178.

Acar & Sakici, 2008. Assessing landscape perception of urban rocky habitats. Bldg & Env., 43:6, 1153-1170.

Akbar, K.F., W.H.D. Hale & A.D. Headley, 2003. Assessment of the scenic beauty of the roadside vegetation in northern England.  Landscape & Urban Plg., 63:3, 139-144.

Anderson, E. 1978. Visual Resource Assessment: Local Perceptions of Familiar Natural Environments. PhD (Natural Resources), University of Michigan.

Anderson, T., E.H. Zube, & W.P. MacConnell, 1976. Predicting scenic resource values. In: Zube, E.H. (Ed), 1976.

Angileri, V & A. Toccolini, 1993. The assessment of visual quality as a tool for the conservation of rural landscape diversity. Landscape & Urban Plg., 24:1-4, 105-112.

Appleton, J., 1975. The Experience of Landscape. John Wiley & Sons, London. 2nd ed. 1996.

Arnberger, A. & R. Eder, 2011. Exploring the Heterogeneity of Rural Landscape Preferences: An Image-Based Latent Class Approach. Landscape Research, 36:1, 19-40.

Arriaza, M., J.F. Cañas-Ortega, J.A. Cañas-Madueño & P. Ruiz-Aviles, 2004. Assessing the visual quality of rural (Spain) landscape. Landscape & Urban Plg., 69:1, 115-125.

Arthur, L.M., 1977. Predicting scenic beauty of forest environments: some empirical tests. Forest Science, 23:2, 151-160.

Banerjee, T., 1977. Who values what? Audience reactions to coastal scenery. Landscape Arch, 67:3, 240 – 243.

Batty, M. & P. Longley, 1994. Fractal Cities. Academic Press, San Diego.

Benfield, J.A., P.A. Bell, L.J. Troup & N.C. Soderstrom, 2010. Aesthetic and affective effects of vocal and traffic noise on natural landscape assessment. Jnl. Env. Psych., 30:1, 103–111.

Bernaldez, F.G. & F. Parra, 1979. Dimensions of landscape preferences from pairwise comparisons. In: Elsner & Smardon (Eds), 1979.

Beza, B., 2010. The aesthetic value of a mountain landscape: A study of the Mt. Everest Trek. Landscape & Urban Plg., 97, 306-317.

Bishop, I.D., 1997. Testing perceived landscape color difference using the Internet. Landscape & Urban Plg. 37:3-4, 187 – 196.

Blasko, E., J.R. González-Olabarria, P. Rodriguéz-Veiga, T. Pukkala, O. Kolehmainen & M. Palahí, 2009. Predicting scenic beauty of forest stands in Catalonia, Jnl. Forestry, 20:1, 73-78.

Brown, S., 1985. Landscape evolution – anathema or essential. Landscape Design, 157, 9-11.

Brown, T.C., T. Keane & S. Kaplan, 1986. Aesthetics and management: bridging the gap. Landscape & Urban Plg,. 13, 1 – 10.

Brown, T. C, 1987. Production and cost of scenic beauty: examples for a ponderosa pine forest. Forest Science, 33:2, 394-410.

Brown, T.C. & Daniel, T.C., 1991. Landscape aesthetics of riparian environments: relationship of flow quantity to scenic quality along a Wild and Scenic River. Water Resources Research, 27, 1787–1795.

Brown, T.J. & R.M. Itami, 1982. Landscape principles study: procedures for landscape assessment and management. Landscape Jnl., 1:2, 113 – 121.

Brush, R.O., 1979. The attractiveness of woodlands: perceptions of forest landowners in Massachusetts.  Forest Science, 25:3, 495-506.

Brush, R.O., 1981. Landform and scenic preference: a research note. Landscape Plg., 8, 301-306.

Brush, R.O. & E.L. Shafer, 1975. Application of a landscape-preference model to land management. In: Zube, E.H., R.O. Brush & J.G. Fabos (Eds), 1975.

Beute, F. & Y.A.W. de Kort, 2013, Let the sun shine! Measuring explicit and implicit preference for environments differing in naturalness, weather type and brightness. Jnl. Env. Psych., 36, 162 – 178.

Buhyoff, G.J. & W.A. Leuschner, 1978. Estimating psychological disutility from damaged forest stands. Forest Science, 24:1, 424-432.

Buhyoff, G.J. & M.F. Riesenman, 1979. Manipulation of dimensionality in landscape preference judgements: a quantitative validation. Leisure Sciences, 2:3/4, 221-238.

Buhyoff, G.J., W.A. Leuschner & J.D Wellman, 1979. Aesthetic impacts of Southern Pine Beetle damage.  Jnl. Env Mgt, 8, 261-267.

Buhyoff, G.J., W.A. Leuschner & L.K. Arndt, 1980. Replication of a scenic preference function. Forest Science, 26:2, 227-230.

Buhyoff, G.J. & J.D. Wellman, 1980. The specification of a non-linear psychophysical function for visual landscape dimensions. Jnl. Leisure Research, 12:3, 257-272.

Buhyoff, G.J., J.D Wellman, N.E. Koch, L. J. Gauthier & S. Hultman, 1983, Landscape preference metrics: an international comparison. Jnl. Env. Mgt, 16, 181-190.

Buhyoff, G.J., L. J. Gauthier & J.D Wellman, 1984. Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurements. Forest Science, 30:1, 71-82.

Buhyoff, G.J., R.B. Hull IV, J.N. Lien & H.K. Cordell, 1986. Prediction of scenic quality for southern pine stands. Forest Science, 32:3, 769-778.

Bulut, Z. & H. Yilmaz, 2009. Determination of waterscape beauties through visual quality assessment method. Env. Mon. & Ass., 154:1-4, 459 – 468.

Bulut, Z., F. Karahan & I. Sezen, 2010. Determining visual beauties of natural waterscapes: A case study for Tortum Valley (Erzurum/Turkey). Scientific Res. & Essay. 5:2, 170 – 182.

Burton, R.J.F., 2012, Understanding farmers’ aesthetic preferences for tidy agricultural landscapes: A Bourdieusian perspective. Landscape Research, 37:1, 51-71.

Byrne, S.M., 1979. Perception of the landscape in the Land’s End Peninsula. Landscape Research, 5:1, 21-24.

Calvin, J.S., J.A. Dearinger & M.E. Curtin, 1972. An attempt at assessing preferences for natural landscapes. Env. & Behav., 4:4, 447-470.

Carls, E.G., 1974. The effects of people and man-induced conditions on preferences for outdoor recreation landscapes. Jnl. Leisure Research, 6:2, 113 – 124.

Carles, J.L., I.L. Barrio, & J.V. de Lucio, 1998. Sound influence on landscape values. Landscape & Urban Plg., 43:4, 191-200.

Cherem, G.J. & B.L. Driver, 1983. Visitor employed photography: a technique to measure common perceptions of natural environments. Jnl. Leisure Research 15:1, 65 – 83.

Choker, B.A. & S.A. Mene, 1992. An assessment of preference for landscapes in the developing world: case study of Warri, Nigeria, and environs. Jnl. Env. Mgt. 34:4, 237-256.

Civco, D.L., 1979. Numerical modeling of eastern Connecticut’s visual resources. In: Elsner & Smardon (Eds), 1979.

Clay, G.R. & T.C. Daniel, 2000. Scenic landscape assessment: the effects of landscape management jurisdiction on public perception of scenic beauty. Landscape & Urban Plg., 49:1-2, 1 – 13.

Codling, R., 2001. Wilderness and aesthetic values in the Antarctic. Polar Record, 37:203, 337-352.

Coeterier, J.F., 1996. Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape.  Landscape & Urban Plg., 34:1, 27-44.

Context Pty. Ltd., 2013. Defining the Aesthetic Values of the Great Barrier Reef. Final Report. Prep. For Australian Dept. for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population & Communities.

Cook, P.S. & T. T. Cable, 1995. The scenic beauty of the shelterbelts on the Great Plains. Landscape & Urban Plg., 32:1, 63-69.

Cook, W.L., 1972. An evaluation of the aesthetic quality of forest trees. Jnl. Leisure Research, 4, 293-302.

Coss, R.G., 1990. All that glistens: water connotations in surface finishes. Ecol. Psych., 2:4, 367 – 380.

Coss, R.G., S. Ruff & T. Simms, 2003. All that glistens: II. The effects of reflective surface finishes on the mouthing activity of infants and toddlers. Ecol. Psych., 15:3, 197 – 213.

Craik, K.H., 1972. Appraising the objectivity of landscape dimensions. In: J.V. Krutilla (Ed), Natural Environments, Studies in Theoretical and Applied Analysis. Resources for the Future, John Hopkins University Press.

Da Silva, C.P., 2004. Landscape perception and coastal management: a methodology to encourage public participation. Jnl. Coastal Research, 39, 930-934.

Daniel, T.C. & R.S. Boster, 1976. Measuring Landscape Esthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167.

Daniel, T.C. & H. Schroeder, 1979. Scenic beauty estimation model: predicting perceived beauty of forest landscapes. In:  Elsner & Smardon (Eds), 1979.

Daniel, T.C., L.M. Anderson, H.W. Schroeder & L. Wheeler III, 1978. Mapping the scenic beauty of forest landscapes. Leisure Sciences, 1:1, 35-52.

Dearden, P., 1980. A statistical technique for the evaluation of the visual quality of the landscape for land-use planning purposes. Jnl. Env. Mgt., 10, 51-68.

Dearinger, J.A., 1979. Measuring preferences for natural landscapes. Jnl. Urban & Dev. Div., 105:1, 63 – 80.

De Groot, W.T. & R.J.G. van der Bone, 2003. Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: an exploration in the Netherlands. Landscape & Urban Plg., 63:3, 127 -138.

De la Fuente de Val, G., J.A. Atauri & J.V. de Lucio, 2006. Relationship between landscape visual attribute and spatial pattern indices – Mediterranean landscape.   Landscape and Urban Plg., 77:4, 393-407.

DeLucio, JV. & M. Múgica, 1994. Landscape preferences and behavior of visitors to Spanish national parks. Landscape & Urban Plg., 29:2-3, 145-160.

Dobbie, M.F., 2013. Public aesthetic preferences to inform sustainable wetland management in Victoria, Australia. Landscape and Urban Plg., 120, 178 – 189.

Dobbie, M.F. & R. Green, 2013. Public perceptions of freshwater wetlands in Victoria, Australia. Landscape & Urban Plg., 110, 143 – 154.

Dramstad, W.E., M.S. Tveit, W.J. Fjellstad & G.L.A. Fry, 2006. Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape & Urban Plg., 78:4, 465 – 474.

Dunn, M.C., 1976. Landscape with photographs: testing the preference approach to landscape evaluation. Jnl. Env. Mgt., 4, 15-26.

Egoz, S., J. Bowring & H. C. Perkins, 2001. Tastes in tension: form, function and meaning in NZ farmed landscapes. Landscape & Urban Plg., 57:3-4, 177 – 196.

Elsner, G.H. & R.C. Smardon (Eds), Proceedings of our National Landscape Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of the Visual Resource, 23-25 April, 1979, Incline Village, Nevada; Pacific SW Forest & Range Experiment Station, Berkeley.

Fairweather, J.R. & S. Swaffield, S.R., 1999. Public Perceptions of Natural and Modified Landscapes of the Coromandel Peninsula, New Zealand. Research Report No. 241, Agribusiness & Economics Research Unit, Lincoln Uni.

Fairweather, J.R. & S. Swaffield, 2003. Public perceptions of the natural character and implications for the forest sector. New Zealand Jnl. Forestry, Feb, 24 – 30.

Ford, R.M., K.J.H. Williams, I.D. Bishop, D. Loiterton & J. Hickey, 2006. Social Acceptability of Forest Management Systems. Bureau of Resource Science Seminar. 17 Nov, 2006.

Ford, R.M., K.J.H. Williams, I. Bishop & T. Webb, 2009. A value basis for the social acceptability of clearfelling in Tasmania, Australia. Landscape & Urban Plg., 90:3-4, 196-206.

Ford, R.M., K.J.H. Williams, I.D. Bishop & J.E. Hickey, 2009. Public judgements of the social acceptability of silvicultural alternatives in Tasmanian wet eucalypt forests. Aust. For., 72:4, 157-171.

Ford, R.M., K.J.H. Williams, I.D. Bishop & J.E. Hickey, 2009. Effects of information on the social acceptability of alternatives to clearfelling in Australian wet eucalypt forest. Env. Mgt., 44:6, 1149-1162.

Ford, R.M., K.J.H. Williams, E.L. Smith & I.D. Bishop, 2014.  Beauty, belief, and trust: toward a model of psychological processes in public acceptance of forest management. Env. & Behav., 46:4, 476-506.

Franco, D., D. Franco, I. Mannino & G. Zanetto, 2003. The impact of agroforestry networks on scenic beauty estimation: the role of a landscape ecological network on a socio-cultural process. Landscape & Urban Plg., 62, 119-138.

Fry, G., M.S. Tveit, A. Ode & M.D. Velarde, 2009. The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators. Ecol. Indicators, 9:5, 933 – 947.

Fyhri, A., J.K.S. Jacobsen & H. Tømmervik, 2009. Tourists’ landscape perceptions and preferences in a Scandinavian coastal region. Landscape & Urban Plg., 91:4, 202-211.

Gobster, P.H. & R.E. Chenoweth, 1989. The dimensions of aesthetic preference: a quantitative analysis. Jnl. Env. Mgt, 29, 47 – 72.

Gobster, P.H. 1999. An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management. Landscape Jnl., 18:1, 54 – 64.

Gregory, K.J. & R.J. Davis, 1983. The perception of riverscape aesthetics: an example from two Hampshire rivers. Jnl. Env. Mgt., 39:3, 171185.

Habron, D., 1998. Visual perception of wild land in Scotland. Landscape & Urban Plg., 45:1, 45-56.

Hagerhall, C.M., T. Purcell & R. Taylor, 2004. Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference. Jnl. Env. Psych., 24:2, 247–255.

Haider, W. and Hunt, L., 2002. Visual aesthetic quality of northern Ontario’s forested shorelines. Env. Mgt., 29:3, 324-334.

Hammitt, W.E., 1979, Measuring familiarity for natural environments through visual images. In: Elsner & Smardon (Eds), 1979.

Hammitt, W.E., M. E. Patterson & F. P. Noe, 1994., Identifying and predicting visual preference of southern Appalachian forest recreation vistas.  Landscape & Urban Plg., 29:2-3, 171-183.

Han, K.T., 2007. Responses to six major terrestrial biomes in terms of scenic beauty, preference and restorativeness. Env. & Behav., 39:4, 529-556.

Hendrix, W.G. & J.G. Fabos, 1975. Visual land use compatibility as a significant contributor to visual resource quality. Int. Jnl. Env. Studies, 8, 21 – 28.

Herzog, T.R., 1984. A cognitive analysis of preference for field and forest environments. Landscape Research, 9:1, 10-16.

Herzog, T.R., 1985. A cognitive analysis of preference for waterscapes. Jnl. Env. Psych., 5, 225 – 241.

Herzog, T.R., 1987. A cognitive analysis of preference for natural environments: mountains, canyons, and deserts. Landscape Jnl., 6:2, 140-152.

Herzog, T.R. & P.J. Bosley, 1992. Tranquillity and preference as affective qualities of natural environments. Jnl Env. Psych., 12:2, 115-127.

Herzog, T.R. & T.A. Gale, 1996. Preference for urban buildings as a function of age and nature context. Env. & Behav., 28:1, 44 – 72.

Hetherington, J., T.C. Daniel & T.C. Brown, 1993. Is motion more important than it sounds? The medium of presentation in environment perception research. Jnl. Env, Psych., 13, 283-291.

Hill, D. & T.C. Daniel, 2007. Foundations for an ecological aesthetic: Can information alter landscape preferences? Soc & Nat. Res., 21, 34-49.

Hodgson, R.W. & R.L. Thayer, 1980. Implied human influence reduces landscape beauty. Landscape Plg., 7, 171 – 179.

Horonje, V. R. D., Y. Kimura, N. P. Miller, W. E. Robert, C. F. Rossano & G. Sanchez,1993. Acoustic Data Collected at Grand Canyon, Haleakala, and Hawaii Volcanoes National Parks. National Park Service, USDI, Report No. 290940.18, Denver, CO.

Hull, R.B. & G. J. Buhyoff, 1986. The Scenic Beauty Temporal Distribution Method: an attempt to make scenic beauty assessments compatible with forest planning efforts. Forest Sci., 32:2, 271-286.

Hull, R.B. & M.M. McCarthy, 1988. Change in the landscape, Landscape & Urban Plg., 15, 265-278.

Hull, R.B. & G.R. Revell, 1989. Cross-cultural comparison of landscape scenic beauty evaluations: a case study in Bali. Jnl. Env. Psych., 9:3, 177 – 191.

Hull IV, R.B. & W.P. Stewart, 1992. Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments. Jnl. Env. Psych., 12:2, 101-114.

Hull IV, R.B. & W.P. Stewart, 1995. The landscape encountered and experienced while hiking. Env. & Behav., 27, 404-426.

Hull, R. B., D.P. Robertson, G.J. Buhyoff & A. Kendra, 2000. What are we hiding behind the visual buffer strip? Forest aesthetics reconsidered. Jnl. Forestry, 98:7, 34-38.

Hunziker, M., P. Felber, K. Gehring, M. Buchecker, N. Bauer & F. Kienast, 2008. Evaluation of landscape change by different social groups results of two empirical studies in Switzerland. Mountain Res. & Dev., 28:2, 140-147.

Hur, M., J.L. Nasar & B. Chun, 2009. Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived naturalness and openness. Jnl.  Env. Psych. 30:1, 52–59.

Iiyama, N., M. Kamada & N. Nakagoshi, 2005. Ecological and social evaluation of landscape in a rural area with terraced paddies in southwestern Japan. Landscape & Urban Plg., 70, 3-4, 301-313.

Jacobs, K.W. & F.E. Hustmyer, 1974. Effects of four psychological primary colors on GSR, heart rate, and respiration. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 38, 763-766.

Jones, G.R., J. Ady & B.A. Gray, 1976. Scenic and recreational highway study for the State of Washington. Landscape Plg., 3:3, 151-302.

Jorgensen, J., J. Hitchmough & T. Calvert, 2002. Woodland spaces and edges: their impact on perception of safety and preference.  Landscape & Urban Plg., 60:3, 135-150.

Junge, X., J. Schűpbach, T. Walter, B. Schmid & P. Lindemann-Matthies, 2015. Aesthetic quality of agricultural landscape seasonal stages Switzerland. Landscape & Urban Plg., 133, 67 – 77.

Kane, 1976. Evaluating Landscape Attractiveness – A Review of Problems and Methods, and a Technique Developed for the National Trust of South Australia. Adelaide: National Trust of SA.

Kane, P.S., 1981. Assessing landscape attractiveness: a comparative test of two new methods. Applied Geog., 1:2, 77-96.

Kaplan, R., S. Kaplan & J.S. Wendt, 1972. Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban material. Perception & Psychophysics, 12:4, 354 – 356.

Kaplan, R., 1977. Preference and everyday nature: method and application. In: Stokols, D. (Ed), Perspectives on Environment and Behavior Theory, Research and Applications, Plenum Press.

Kaplan, S., 1979. Perceptions and Landscape: Conceptions and Misconceptions. In: Elsner & Smardon (Eds), 1979.

Kaplan, R. & E.J. Herbert, 1987. Cultural and sub-cultural comparisons in preferences for natural settings.  Landscape & Urban Plg., 14, 281-293.

Kaplan, R. & J.F. Talbot, 1988. Ethnicity and preference for natural settings: a review and recent findings. Landscape & Urban Plg., 15, 107 – 117.

Kaplan, R. & S. Kaplan, 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Kaufman, A.J. & V.I. Lohr, 2004. Does plant color affect emotional and physiological responses to landscapes? In: Congress: Expanding roles for horticulture, human well-being and life quality.

Kearney, A.R. & G.A. Bradley, 2011. The effects of viewer attributes for forest scenes: contributions of attitudes knowledge, demographic factors, and stakeholder group membership. Env. & Behav., 43:2, 147-181.

Kellomaki, S. & R. Savolainen, 1984. The scenic value of the forest landscape as assessed in the field and the laboratory. Landscape Plg., 11, 97-107.

Kliskey, A.D., 1994. Mapping multiple perceptions of wilderness in southern NZ, II: an alternative multivariate approach. Applied Geog., 14:4, 308–326.

Knopp, T.B., G. Ballman & L.C. Merriam, 1979. Toward a more direct measure of river user preferences. Jnl.  Leisure Research, 11:4, 31- 326.

Kuper, R., 2013. Here and gone. The visual effects of seasonal changes in plant and vegetative characteristics on landscape preference criteria. Landscape Jnl., 32:1, 65-78.

Lamb, R.J. & A.T. Purcell, 1990. Perception of naturalness in landscape and its relationship to vegetation structure. Landscape & Urban Plg., 19:4, 333 – 352.

Lee, S.W., C.D. Ellis, B.S. Kweon & S.K. Hong, 2008. Relationship between landscape structure and neighborhood satisfaction in urbanized areas. Landscape & Urban Plg., 85:1, 60–70.

Lewis, J.L., 2008. Perceptions of landscape change in a rural British Columbia community. Landscape & Urban Plg., 85:1, 49-59.

Lindemann-Matthies, P., R. Briegel, B. Schüpbach & X. Junge, 2010. Aesthetic preference for a Swiss alpine landscape: the impact of different agricultural land-use with different biodiversity. Landscape & Urban Plg., 98, 99-109.

Lohr, V.I., 2007. Benefits of nature: what we are learning about why people respond to nature. Jnl. Physiological Anthropology, 26:2, 83-85.

Low J.F., V.A. Froude & H.G. Rennie, 2010. The nature of natural: defining natural character for the New Zealand context. New Zealand. Ecology, Jan 1:332 – 341.

Lyons, E., 1983. Demographic correlates of landscape preference. Env. & Behav., 15:4, 487 – 511.

Mace, B.L., P.A. Bell & R.J. Loomis, 1999. Aesthetic, affective, and cognitive effects of noise on natural landscape assessment. Society & Natural Resources, 12:3, 225-242.

Mandelbrot, B., 1983. The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W.H. Freeman & Co, New York.

Misgav, A., 2000. Visual preferences of the public for vegetation groups in Israel. Landscape & Urban Plg.48:3-4, 143-159.

Morgan, R., 1999. Some factors affecting coastal landscape aesthetic quality assessment. Landscape Research, 24:2, 167-184.

Mosley, M.P., 1989. Perceptions of New Zealand river scenery. New Zealand Geographer, 45:1, 2-13.

Müderrisoğlu, H., E. Eroğlu, Ş. Özkan & K. Ak, 2006. Visual perception of tree forms. Bldg & Env., 41:6, 796-806.

Nasar, J. & Yi-Hsuan Lin, 2003. Evaluative responses to five kinds of water features. Landscape Research, 28:4, 441-450.

Nasar, J. & Minhui Li, 2004. Landscape mirror: the attractiveness of reflecting water. Landscape & Urban Plg., 66, 233–238.

Nassauer, J.I. & M.K. Benner, 1984. Visual preferences for a coastal landscape including oil and gas development. Jnl. Env. Mgt., 18, 323-338.

Nassauer, J.I., 1989. Agricultural policy and aesthetic objectives. Jnl. Soil & Water Cons., 44:5, 384-387.

Nassauer, J.I., 1995. Culture and changing landscape structure. Landscape Ecology, 10:4, 229-237.

Nassauer, J.L., R.C. Corry & R.M. Cruse, 2002. The landscape in 2025: Alternative future landscape scenarios, a means to consider agricultural policy.  Jnl. Soil & Water Cons., 57:2, 45-53.

Nieman, T.J., 1978. Visual quality: the attitude and perception of coastal zone user groups. In: Weidemann, S. & J.R. Anderson, (Eds), 1978.

Ode, A., M.S. Tveit & G. Fry, 2008. Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: Touching base with landscape aesthetic theory. Landscape Research, 33:1, 89-117.

Ode, A., G. Fry, M.S. Tveit, P. Messager & D. Miller, 2009. Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. Jnl. Env. Mgt., 90:1, 375 – 383.

Ode, Å, C.M. Hagerhall & N. Sang, 2010. Analyzing visual landscape complexity: Theory and application. Landscape Research, 35:1, 111 – 131.

Orland, B., 1988. Aesthetic preference for rural landscapes: some resident and visitor differences. In: Nasar, J.L., (Ed), 1988. Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Palmer, J.F. & E.H. Zube, 1976, Numerical and perceptual landscape classification. In: Zube, E.H. (Ed), 1976.

Palmer, J.F., 1978. An investigation of the conceptual classification of landscapes and its application to landscape planning issues. In: Weidemann, S. & J.R. Anderson, 1978.

Palmer, J.F., 2004. Using spatial metrics to predict scene perception in a changing landscape, Dennis, Mass. Landscape & Urban Plg., 69:2/3, 201 – 218.

Palmer, S.E. & K.B. Schloss, 2010. An ecological valence theory of human color preference. Psych & Cognitive Science, 107:19, 8877– 8882.

Palmer, S.E., K.B. Schloss & J. Sammartino, 2012. Hidden knowledge in aesthetic judgments: preferences for color and spatial composition. In: Shimamura, A.P. & S.E. Palmer (Eds), Aesthetic Science: Connecting Minds, Brains, and Experience. Oxford University Press.

Papadimitriou, F., 2012, The algorithmic complexity of landscapes. Landscape Research, 37:5, 591- 611.

Patsfall, M.R., N.R. Feimer, G.J. Buhyoff & J.D. Wellman, 1984. The prediction of scenic beauty from landscape content and composition. Jnl. Env. Psych., 4:1, 7-26.

Parsons, R. & T.C. Daniel, 1988. Assessing visibility impairment in class I parks and wilderness areas: A comparison of policy‐relevant methods. Society & Nat Resources, 1:1, 227-240.

Penning-Rowsell, E.C., 1982. A public preference evaluation of landscape quality. Reg. Studies, 16:2, 97-112.

Pentland, A., 1984. Fractal-based description of natural scenes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 661–674.

Pérez, J.G., 2002. Ascertaining landscape perceptions and preferences with pair-wise photographs: Planning rural tourism in Extremadura, Spain. Landscape Research, 27:3, 297-308.

Peron,E., A.T. Purcell, H. Staats, S. Falchero & R.J. Lamb, 1998. Models of preference for outdoor scenes: some experimental evidence.  Env. & Behav., 30:3, 282-305.

Peterson, G.L. & E.S. Neumann, 1969. Modeling and predicting human response to the visual recreation environment. Jnl. Leisure Research, 1, 219-237.

Pflüger, Y., A. Rackham & S. Larned, 2010. The aesthetic value of river flows: An assessment of flow preferences for large and small rivers. Landscape & Urban Plg., 95, 68-78.

Pitt, D.G., 1976. Physical dimensions of scenic quality in streams. In: Zube, E.H., 1976.

Pomeroy, J.W., M.B. Green & J.E. FitzGibbon, 1983. Evaluation of urban riverscape aesthetics in the Canadian prairies. Jnl. Env. Mgt., 17, 263 – 276.

Prineas, T. & P.J. Allen, 1992. Queensland’s Wet Tropics World Heritage Area. Mapping the scenic quality. Landscape Aust., 3, 241 – 246.

Purcell, A.T. & R. J. Lamb, 1998. Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach. Landscape & Urban Plg., 42:1, 57-66.

Purcell, A.T., R.J. Lamb, E.M. Peron & S. Falchero, 1994. Preference or preferences for landscape? Jnl. Env. Psych., 14:3, 195-209.

Purcell, T., E. Peron & R. Berto, 2001. Why do preferences differ between scene types? Env. & Behav., 33:1, 93-106.

Rechtman, R., 2013. Visual perception of agricultural cultivated landscapes: key components as predictors of landscape preferences. Landscape Research, 38:3, 273-294.

Ribe, R., 1986. A test of uniqueness and diversity visual assessment factors using judgement‐independent measures. Landscape Research, 11:2, 13 – 15.

Ribe, R.G., 1991. The scenic impact of key forest attributes and long-term management alternatives for hardwood forests. In: L. H. McConnick & K. W. Gottschalk (Eds) Proceedings, 8th Central Hardwood Forest Conference, Gen Tech Report NE 148, University Park, Pennsylvania, March 4-6, 1991.

Ribe, R.G., 2006. Perceptions of forestry alternatives in the US Pacific Northwest: Information effects and acceptability distribution analysis. Jnl. Env. Psych., 26:2, 100 – 115.

Ribe, R.G., 2009. In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the US Pacific Northwest: The effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood. Jnl. Env. Mgt., 91, 245-260.

Ribe, R.G. & M.Y. Matteson, 2002. Views of old forestry and new among reference groups in the Pacific Northwest. Jnl. App. For., 17:4, 173-182.

Ródenas, M., F. Sancho-Royo & F. González-Bernáldez, 1975. Structure of landscape preferences – a study based on large dams viewed in their landscape setting. Landscape Plg., 2, 159-178.

Rogge, E., F. Nevens & H. Gulinck, 2007. Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders: Looking beyond aesthetics. Landscape & Urban Plg., 82:4, 159-174.

Rosenberger, R.S. & E.L. Smith, 1998. Assessing Forest Scenic Beauty Impacts of Insects and Management. Forest Service FHTET 98-08.

Ruddell, E.J., J.H. Gramann, V.A. Rudis & J.M. Westphal, 1989. The psychological utility of visual penetration in near-view forest scenic-beauty models. Env. & Behav., 21:4, 393-412.

Sang, N., D. Miller & A. Ode, 2008. Landscape metrics and visual topology in the analysis of landscape preference. Env & Plg B, 35:3, 504 – 520.

Schirpke, U., E. Tasser & U. Tappeiner, 2013. Predicting scenic beauty of mountain regions. Landscape & Urban Plg., 111, 1-12.

Schroeder, H.W. & T.C. Brown, 1983. Alternative functional forms for an inventory-based landscape perception model. Jnl. Leisure Research, 15:2, 156-163.

Schroeder, H.W. & T.C. Daniel, 1981. Progress in predicting the perceived scenic beauty of forest landscapes. Forest Science, 27:1, 71-80.

Schroeder, H.W., 1991. Preference and meaning of arboretum landscapes: Combining quantitative and qualitative data. Jnl. Env. Psych., 11:3, 231-248.

Scott, A., 2002. Assessing public perception of landscape: The LANDMAP experience. Landscape Research, 27:3, 271-295.

Shafer, E.L., J.F. Hamilton & E.A. Schmidt, 1969. Natural landscape preference: a predictive model. Jnl. Leisure Research, 1:1, 1-19.

Sherren, K., J. Fischer, J. Pink, J. Stott, J. Stein & H-J. Yoon, 2011. Australian graziers value sparse trees in their pastures: A viewshed analysis of photo-elicitation. Society & Nat Resources, 24:4, 412-422.

Shuttleworth, S., 1983. Upland landscapes and the landscape image. Landscape Research, 8:3, 7-14.

Sommer, R. & J. Summit, 1995. An exploratory study of preferred tree form. Env. & Behav., 24:4, 540-557.

Stadler B., R. Purves & M. Tomko, 2011. Exploring the relationship between land cover and subjective evaluation of scenic beauty through user generated content. 25th Int. Cartographic Conf., Paris, France, 3 – 8 July, 2011.

Stamps, A.E., 1994. Formal and nonformal stimulus factors in environmental preference. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 79, 3 – 9.

Stamps, A.E., 2002. Fractals, skylines, nature and beauty. Landscape & Urban Plg., 60:3, 163-184.

Stober, D., A. Pogačnik & S. Lončar-Vicković, 2012. Comparison of students and experts’ attitudes on planning and managing the Drava and Mura River landscape (Croatia). Technical Gazette, 19:3, 573 – 581.

Strumse, E., 1994, Perceptual dimensions in the visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway. Jnl. Env. Psych., 14:4, 281-292.

Strumse, E., 1994. Environmental attributes and the prediction of visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway. Jnl. Env. Psych., 14:4, 293-303.

Strumse, E., 1996. Demographic differences in the visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in Western Norway.  Jnl. Env. Psych., 16, 17-31.

Sullivan, W.C., 1994. Perceptions of the rural-urban fringe: citizen preferences for natural and developed settings. Landscape & Urban Plg., 29, 85-101.

Summerson, R. & I.D. Bishop, 2011. Aesthetic value in Antarctica: beautiful or sublime? The Polar Jnl., 1:2, 225-250.

Tahvanainen, L., L. Tyrväinen & I. Nousiainen, 1996. Effect of afforestation on the scenic value of rural landscape. Scandinavian Jnl. For. Res., 11:1-4, 397 – 405.

Tahvanainen, L. & L. Tyrväinen, 1998. Model for predicting the scenic value of rural landscape: A preliminary study of landscape preferences in North Carelia. Scandinavian Jnl. For. Res., 13:1-4, 379-385.

Tempesta, T., 2010. The perception of agrarian historical landscapes: a study of the Veneto plain in Italy. Landscape & Urban Plg., 97. 258-272.

Treiman, E.F., D.B. Champion & M.J. Wecksung, 1979. Simulation of the visual effects of power plant plumes. In: Elsner & Smardon (Eds), 1979.

Tsunetsugu, Y., J. Leeb, B-J. Park, L. Tyrväinen, T. Kagawa, & Y. Miyazaki, 2013. Physiological and psychological effects of viewing urban forest landscapes assessed by multiple measurements. Landscape & Urban Plg., 113, 90-93.

Tunstall, S., S. Tapsel & M. House, 2004, Children’s perceptions of river landscapes and play: what children’s photographs reveal. Landscape Research, 29:2, 181-204.

Tveit, M.S., 2009. Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference. Jnl.  Env. Mgt. 90:9, 2882–2888.

Ulrich, R.S., 1981. Natural versus urban scenes, some psychophysiological effects. Env. & Behav., 13:5, 523 – 556.

Uuemaa, E., M. Antrop, J. Roosaare, R. Marja & U. Mander, 2009. Landscape metrics and indices: an overview of their use in landscape research. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 3, 1 – 28.

Van den Berg, A.E. & S.L. Koole, 2006. New wilderness in the Netherlands: an investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes. Landscape & Urban Plg., 76, 362 –  372.

Van der Wal, D. Miller, J. Irvine, S. Fiorini, A. Amar, S. Yearley, R. Gill & N. Dandy, 2014. The influence of information provision on people’s landscape preferences: A case study on understorey vegetation of deer-browsed woodlands. Landscape & Urban Plg., 124, 129-139.

van Marwijk, R.B.M, B.H.M. Elands, J.K. Kampen, S. Terlouw, D.G. Pitt & P. Opdam, 2012. Public perceptions of the attractiveness of restored nature. Restoration Ecology, 20:6, 773 – 780.

van Zanten, B.RT., P.H. Verburg, M.J. Koetse & P.J.H. van Beukering, 2014. Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies. Landscape & Urban Plg., 132, 89 – 101.

Vining, J., T.C. Daniel & H.W. Schroeder, 1984. Predicting scenic values in forested residential landscapes. Jnl. Leisure Research, 16:2, 124-135.

Vodak, M.C., P.L. Roberts, J.D. Wellman & G.J. Buhyoff, 1985. Scenic impacts of eastern hardwood management. Forest Science. 31:2, 289-301.

Weidemann, S. & J.R. Anderson, (Eds), 1978. Priorities for Environmental Design Research. Environment Design Research Association.

Weinstoerffer, J. & P. Girardin, 2000. Assessment of the contribution of land use pattern and intensity to landscape quality: use of a landscape indicator. Ecol. Modeling, 130:1-3, 95 – 109.

White, M.P., D. Cracknell, A. Corcoran, G. Jenkinson & M.H. Depledge, 2014. Do preferences for waterscapes persist in inclement weather and extend to sub-aquatic scenes? Landscape Research, 39:4, 339-358.

Whitmore, W., E. Cook & F. Steiner, 1995. Public involvement in visual assessment: The Verde River Corridor study. Landscape Jnl., 14:1, 27 – 45.

Williams, K.J.H. & J. Cary, 2002. Landscape preferences, ecological quality & biodiversity protection. Env. & Behav., 34:2, 257-274.

Williamson, D.N. & J.A. Chalmers, 1982. Perceptions of Forest Scenic Quality in Northeast Victoria. A Technical Report of Research Phases 1 and 2. Forests Commission, Victoria, Melbourne.

Willis, K.G., G.D. Garrod, R. Scarpa, N. Powe, A. Lovett, I.J. Batemen, N. Hanley & D.C. Macmillan, 2003.The Social and Environmental Benefits of Forests in Great Britain. Centre for Research in Env. Appraisal & Mgt, Uni Newcastle. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.

Wilson, M.I., L.D. Robertson, M. Daly & S.A. Walton, 1995. Effects of visual cues on assessment of water quality. Jnl. Env. Psych. 15, 53 – 63.

Wu, W., 2013. Study on the value assessment and dynamic change of the dust detainment of Hangzhou scenic forestland. Research Jnl. App. Sci, Eng & Tech., 5:19, 4677-4680.

Yamashita, S. 2002. Perception and evaluation of water in landscape: use of photo-projective method to compare child and adult residents’ perceptions of a Japanese river environment. Landscape & Urban Plg.,. 62, 3–17.

Yarrow, C., 1966. A preliminary survey of the public’s concepts of amenity in British forestry. Forestry, 39. 59-67.

Zhao, J., R. Wang, Y. Cai & P. Luo, 2013. Effects of visual indicators on landscape preferences. Jnl. Urban Plg & Dev., 139:1, 70 – 78.

Zheng, B., Y. Zhang & J. Chen, 2011. Preference to home landscape: wildness or neatness? Landscape & Urban Plg., 99, 1 – 8

Zube, E.H., 1973. Rating everyday rural landscapes of the north-eastern U.S. Landscape Arch., 63:4, 370 – 375.

Zube, E.H., D. G. Pitt & T. W. Anderson, 1975. Perception and prediction of scenic resource values of the northeast. In: Zube, E.H. et al, (Eds), 1975.

Zube, E.H., R.O. Brush & J.G. Fabos (Eds), 1975. Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions and Resources. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Penn.

Zube, E.H., 1976. Studies in Landscape Perception. Institute for Man and Environment, Publication No R-76-1, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Zube, E.H., Pitt, D.G., Evans, G.W., 1983. A lifespan developmental study of landscape assessment. Jnl. Env. Psych. 3, 115–128.