Following are the references cited in the various themes of the Findings of Landscape Quality Research.
Abello & Bernaldez, 1986, Landscape preference and personality. Landscape & Urban Plg, 13, 19- 28.
Abello, et al, 1986. Consensus and contrast components in landscape preference. Env. & Behav. 18:2, 155 – 178.
Acar & Sakici, 2008. Assessing landscape perception of urban rocky habitats. Bldg & Env., 43:6, 1153-1170.
Akbar, K.F., W.H.D. Hale & A.D. Headley, 2003. Assessment of the scenic beauty of the roadside vegetation in northern England. Landscape & Urban Plg., 63:3, 139-144.
Anderson, E. 1978. Visual Resource Assessment: Local Perceptions of Familiar Natural Environments. PhD (Natural Resources), University of Michigan.
Anderson, T., E.H. Zube, & W.P. MacConnell, 1976. Predicting scenic resource values. In: Zube, E.H. (Ed), 1976.
Angileri, V & A. Toccolini, 1993. The assessment of visual quality as a tool for the conservation of rural landscape diversity. Landscape & Urban Plg., 24:1-4, 105-112.
Appleton, J., 1975. The Experience of Landscape. John Wiley & Sons, London. 2nd ed. 1996.
Arnberger, A. & R. Eder, 2011. Exploring the Heterogeneity of Rural Landscape Preferences: An Image-Based Latent Class Approach. Landscape Research, 36:1, 19-40.
Arriaza, M., J.F. Cañas-Ortega, J.A. Cañas-Madueño & P. Ruiz-Aviles, 2004. Assessing the visual quality of rural (Spain) landscape. Landscape & Urban Plg., 69:1, 115-125.
Arthur, L.M., 1977. Predicting scenic beauty of forest environments: some empirical tests. Forest Science, 23:2, 151-160.
Banerjee, T., 1977. Who values what? Audience reactions to coastal scenery. Landscape Arch, 67:3, 240 – 243.
Batty, M. & P. Longley, 1994. Fractal Cities. Academic Press, San Diego.
Benfield, J.A., P.A. Bell, L.J. Troup & N.C. Soderstrom, 2010. Aesthetic and affective effects of vocal and traffic noise on natural landscape assessment. Jnl. Env. Psych., 30:1, 103–111.
Bernaldez, F.G. & F. Parra, 1979. Dimensions of landscape preferences from pairwise comparisons. In: Elsner & Smardon (Eds), 1979.
Beza, B., 2010. The aesthetic value of a mountain landscape: A study of the Mt. Everest Trek. Landscape & Urban Plg., 97, 306-317.
Bishop, I.D., 1997. Testing perceived landscape color difference using the Internet. Landscape & Urban Plg. 37:3-4, 187 – 196.
Blasko, E., J.R. González-Olabarria, P. Rodriguéz-Veiga, T. Pukkala, O. Kolehmainen & M. Palahí, 2009. Predicting scenic beauty of forest stands in Catalonia, Jnl. Forestry, 20:1, 73-78.
Brown, S., 1985. Landscape evolution – anathema or essential. Landscape Design, 157, 9-11.
Brown, T.C., T. Keane & S. Kaplan, 1986. Aesthetics and management: bridging the gap. Landscape & Urban Plg,. 13, 1 – 10.
Brown, T. C, 1987. Production and cost of scenic beauty: examples for a ponderosa pine forest. Forest Science, 33:2, 394-410.
Brown, T.C. & Daniel, T.C., 1991. Landscape aesthetics of riparian environments: relationship of flow quantity to scenic quality along a Wild and Scenic River. Water Resources Research, 27, 1787–1795.
Brown, T.J. & R.M. Itami, 1982. Landscape principles study: procedures for landscape assessment and management. Landscape Jnl., 1:2, 113 – 121.
Brush, R.O., 1979. The attractiveness of woodlands: perceptions of forest landowners in Massachusetts. Forest Science, 25:3, 495-506.
Brush, R.O., 1981. Landform and scenic preference: a research note. Landscape Plg., 8, 301-306.
Brush, R.O. & E.L. Shafer, 1975. Application of a landscape-preference model to land management. In: Zube, E.H., R.O. Brush & J.G. Fabos (Eds), 1975.
Beute, F. & Y.A.W. de Kort, 2013, Let the sun shine! Measuring explicit and implicit preference for environments differing in naturalness, weather type and brightness. Jnl. Env. Psych., 36, 162 – 178.
Buhyoff, G.J. & W.A. Leuschner, 1978. Estimating psychological disutility from damaged forest stands. Forest Science, 24:1, 424-432.
Buhyoff, G.J. & M.F. Riesenman, 1979. Manipulation of dimensionality in landscape preference judgements: a quantitative validation. Leisure Sciences, 2:3/4, 221-238.
Buhyoff, G.J., W.A. Leuschner & J.D Wellman, 1979. Aesthetic impacts of Southern Pine Beetle damage. Jnl. Env Mgt, 8, 261-267.
Buhyoff, G.J., W.A. Leuschner & L.K. Arndt, 1980. Replication of a scenic preference function. Forest Science, 26:2, 227-230.
Buhyoff, G.J. & J.D. Wellman, 1980. The specification of a non-linear psychophysical function for visual landscape dimensions. Jnl. Leisure Research, 12:3, 257-272.
Buhyoff, G.J., J.D Wellman, N.E. Koch, L. J. Gauthier & S. Hultman, 1983, Landscape preference metrics: an international comparison. Jnl. Env. Mgt, 16, 181-190.
Buhyoff, G.J., L. J. Gauthier & J.D Wellman, 1984. Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurements. Forest Science, 30:1, 71-82.
Buhyoff, G.J., R.B. Hull IV, J.N. Lien & H.K. Cordell, 1986. Prediction of scenic quality for southern pine stands. Forest Science, 32:3, 769-778.
Bulut, Z. & H. Yilmaz, 2009. Determination of waterscape beauties through visual quality assessment method. Env. Mon. & Ass., 154:1-4, 459 – 468.
Bulut, Z., F. Karahan & I. Sezen, 2010. Determining visual beauties of natural waterscapes: A case study for Tortum Valley (Erzurum/Turkey). Scientific Res. & Essay. 5:2, 170 – 182.
Burton, R.J.F., 2012, Understanding farmers’ aesthetic preferences for tidy agricultural landscapes: A Bourdieusian perspective. Landscape Research, 37:1, 51-71.
Byrne, S.M., 1979. Perception of the landscape in the Land’s End Peninsula. Landscape Research, 5:1, 21-24.
Calvin, J.S., J.A. Dearinger & M.E. Curtin, 1972. An attempt at assessing preferences for natural landscapes. Env. & Behav., 4:4, 447-470.
Carls, E.G., 1974. The effects of people and man-induced conditions on preferences for outdoor recreation landscapes. Jnl. Leisure Research, 6:2, 113 – 124.
Carles, J.L., I.L. Barrio, & J.V. de Lucio, 1998. Sound influence on landscape values. Landscape & Urban Plg., 43:4, 191-200.
Cherem, G.J. & B.L. Driver, 1983. Visitor employed photography: a technique to measure common perceptions of natural environments. Jnl. Leisure Research 15:1, 65 – 83.
Choker, B.A. & S.A. Mene, 1992. An assessment of preference for landscapes in the developing world: case study of Warri, Nigeria, and environs. Jnl. Env. Mgt. 34:4, 237-256.
Civco, D.L., 1979. Numerical modeling of eastern Connecticut’s visual resources. In: Elsner & Smardon (Eds), 1979.
Clay, G.R. & T.C. Daniel, 2000. Scenic landscape assessment: the effects of landscape management jurisdiction on public perception of scenic beauty. Landscape & Urban Plg., 49:1-2, 1 – 13.
Codling, R., 2001. Wilderness and aesthetic values in the Antarctic. Polar Record, 37:203, 337-352.
Coeterier, J.F., 1996. Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape. Landscape & Urban Plg., 34:1, 27-44.
Context Pty. Ltd., 2013. Defining the Aesthetic Values of the Great Barrier Reef. Final Report. Prep. For Australian Dept. for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population & Communities.
Cook, P.S. & T. T. Cable, 1995. The scenic beauty of the shelterbelts on the Great Plains. Landscape & Urban Plg., 32:1, 63-69.
Cook, W.L., 1972. An evaluation of the aesthetic quality of forest trees. Jnl. Leisure Research, 4, 293-302.
Coss, R.G., 1990. All that glistens: water connotations in surface finishes. Ecol. Psych., 2:4, 367 – 380.
Coss, R.G., S. Ruff & T. Simms, 2003. All that glistens: II. The effects of reflective surface finishes on the mouthing activity of infants and toddlers. Ecol. Psych., 15:3, 197 – 213.
Craik, K.H., 1972. Appraising the objectivity of landscape dimensions. In: J.V. Krutilla (Ed), Natural Environments, Studies in Theoretical and Applied Analysis. Resources for the Future, John Hopkins University Press.
Da Silva, C.P., 2004. Landscape perception and coastal management: a methodology to encourage public participation. Jnl. Coastal Research, 39, 930-934.
Daniel, T.C. & R.S. Boster, 1976. Measuring Landscape Esthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167.
Daniel, T.C. & H. Schroeder, 1979. Scenic beauty estimation model: predicting perceived beauty of forest landscapes. In: Elsner & Smardon (Eds), 1979.
Daniel, T.C., L.M. Anderson, H.W. Schroeder & L. Wheeler III, 1978. Mapping the scenic beauty of forest landscapes. Leisure Sciences, 1:1, 35-52.
Dearden, P., 1980. A statistical technique for the evaluation of the visual quality of the landscape for land-use planning purposes. Jnl. Env. Mgt., 10, 51-68.
Dearinger, J.A., 1979. Measuring preferences for natural landscapes. Jnl. Urban & Dev. Div., 105:1, 63 – 80.
De Groot, W.T. & R.J.G. van der Bone, 2003. Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: an exploration in the Netherlands. Landscape & Urban Plg., 63:3, 127 -138.
De la Fuente de Val, G., J.A. Atauri & J.V. de Lucio, 2006. Relationship between landscape visual attribute and spatial pattern indices – Mediterranean landscape. Landscape and Urban Plg., 77:4, 393-407.
DeLucio, JV. & M. Múgica, 1994. Landscape preferences and behavior of visitors to Spanish national parks. Landscape & Urban Plg., 29:2-3, 145-160.
Dobbie, M.F., 2013. Public aesthetic preferences to inform sustainable wetland management in Victoria, Australia. Landscape and Urban Plg., 120, 178 – 189.
Dobbie, M.F. & R. Green, 2013. Public perceptions of freshwater wetlands in Victoria, Australia. Landscape & Urban Plg., 110, 143 – 154.
Dramstad, W.E., M.S. Tveit, W.J. Fjellstad & G.L.A. Fry, 2006. Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape & Urban Plg., 78:4, 465 – 474.
Dunn, M.C., 1976. Landscape with photographs: testing the preference approach to landscape evaluation. Jnl. Env. Mgt., 4, 15-26.
Egoz, S., J. Bowring & H. C. Perkins, 2001. Tastes in tension: form, function and meaning in NZ farmed landscapes. Landscape & Urban Plg., 57:3-4, 177 – 196.
Elsner, G.H. & R.C. Smardon (Eds), Proceedings of our National Landscape Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of the Visual Resource, 23-25 April, 1979, Incline Village, Nevada; Pacific SW Forest & Range Experiment Station, Berkeley.
Fairweather, J.R. & S. Swaffield, S.R., 1999. Public Perceptions of Natural and Modified Landscapes of the Coromandel Peninsula, New Zealand. Research Report No. 241, Agribusiness & Economics Research Unit, Lincoln Uni.
Fairweather, J.R. & S. Swaffield, 2003. Public perceptions of the natural character and implications for the forest sector. New Zealand Jnl. Forestry, Feb, 24 – 30.
Ford, R.M., K.J.H. Williams, I.D. Bishop, D. Loiterton & J. Hickey, 2006. Social Acceptability of Forest Management Systems. Bureau of Resource Science Seminar. 17 Nov, 2006.
Ford, R.M., K.J.H. Williams, I. Bishop & T. Webb, 2009. A value basis for the social acceptability of clearfelling in Tasmania, Australia. Landscape & Urban Plg., 90:3-4, 196-206.
Ford, R.M., K.J.H. Williams, I.D. Bishop & J.E. Hickey, 2009. Public judgements of the social acceptability of silvicultural alternatives in Tasmanian wet eucalypt forests. Aust. For., 72:4, 157-171.
Ford, R.M., K.J.H. Williams, I.D. Bishop & J.E. Hickey, 2009. Effects of information on the social acceptability of alternatives to clearfelling in Australian wet eucalypt forest. Env. Mgt., 44:6, 1149-1162.
Ford, R.M., K.J.H. Williams, E.L. Smith & I.D. Bishop, 2014. Beauty, belief, and trust: toward a model of psychological processes in public acceptance of forest management. Env. & Behav., 46:4, 476-506.
Franco, D., D. Franco, I. Mannino & G. Zanetto, 2003. The impact of agroforestry networks on scenic beauty estimation: the role of a landscape ecological network on a socio-cultural process. Landscape & Urban Plg., 62, 119-138.
Fry, G., M.S. Tveit, A. Ode & M.D. Velarde, 2009. The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators. Ecol. Indicators, 9:5, 933 – 947.
Fyhri, A., J.K.S. Jacobsen & H. Tømmervik, 2009. Tourists’ landscape perceptions and preferences in a Scandinavian coastal region. Landscape & Urban Plg., 91:4, 202-211.
Gobster, P.H. & R.E. Chenoweth, 1989. The dimensions of aesthetic preference: a quantitative analysis. Jnl. Env. Mgt, 29, 47 – 72.
Gobster, P.H. 1999. An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management. Landscape Jnl., 18:1, 54 – 64.
Gregory, K.J. & R.J. Davis, 1983. The perception of riverscape aesthetics: an example from two Hampshire rivers. Jnl. Env. Mgt., 39:3, 171185.
Habron, D., 1998. Visual perception of wild land in Scotland. Landscape & Urban Plg., 45:1, 45-56.
Hagerhall, C.M., T. Purcell & R. Taylor, 2004. Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference. Jnl. Env. Psych., 24:2, 247–255.
Haider, W. and Hunt, L., 2002. Visual aesthetic quality of northern Ontario’s forested shorelines. Env. Mgt., 29:3, 324-334.
Hammitt, W.E., 1979, Measuring familiarity for natural environments through visual images. In: Elsner & Smardon (Eds), 1979.
Hammitt, W.E., M. E. Patterson & F. P. Noe, 1994., Identifying and predicting visual preference of southern Appalachian forest recreation vistas. Landscape & Urban Plg., 29:2-3, 171-183.
Han, K.T., 2007. Responses to six major terrestrial biomes in terms of scenic beauty, preference and restorativeness. Env. & Behav., 39:4, 529-556.
Hendrix, W.G. & J.G. Fabos, 1975. Visual land use compatibility as a significant contributor to visual resource quality. Int. Jnl. Env. Studies, 8, 21 – 28.
Herzog, T.R., 1984. A cognitive analysis of preference for field and forest environments. Landscape Research, 9:1, 10-16.
Herzog, T.R., 1985. A cognitive analysis of preference for waterscapes. Jnl. Env. Psych., 5, 225 – 241.
Herzog, T.R., 1987. A cognitive analysis of preference for natural environments: mountains, canyons, and deserts. Landscape Jnl., 6:2, 140-152.
Herzog, T.R. & P.J. Bosley, 1992. Tranquillity and preference as affective qualities of natural environments. Jnl Env. Psych., 12:2, 115-127.
Herzog, T.R. & T.A. Gale, 1996. Preference for urban buildings as a function of age and nature context. Env. & Behav., 28:1, 44 – 72.
Hetherington, J., T.C. Daniel & T.C. Brown, 1993. Is motion more important than it sounds? The medium of presentation in environment perception research. Jnl. Env, Psych., 13, 283-291.
Hill, D. & T.C. Daniel, 2007. Foundations for an ecological aesthetic: Can information alter landscape preferences? Soc & Nat. Res., 21, 34-49.
Hodgson, R.W. & R.L. Thayer, 1980. Implied human influence reduces landscape beauty. Landscape Plg., 7, 171 – 179.
Horonje, V. R. D., Y. Kimura, N. P. Miller, W. E. Robert, C. F. Rossano & G. Sanchez,1993. Acoustic Data Collected at Grand Canyon, Haleakala, and Hawaii Volcanoes National Parks. National Park Service, USDI, Report No. 290940.18, Denver, CO.
Hull, R.B. & G. J. Buhyoff, 1986. The Scenic Beauty Temporal Distribution Method: an attempt to make scenic beauty assessments compatible with forest planning efforts. Forest Sci., 32:2, 271-286.
Hull, R.B. & M.M. McCarthy, 1988. Change in the landscape, Landscape & Urban Plg., 15, 265-278.
Hull, R.B. & G.R. Revell, 1989. Cross-cultural comparison of landscape scenic beauty evaluations: a case study in Bali. Jnl. Env. Psych., 9:3, 177 – 191.
Hull IV, R.B. & W.P. Stewart, 1992. Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments. Jnl. Env. Psych., 12:2, 101-114.
Hull IV, R.B. & W.P. Stewart, 1995. The landscape encountered and experienced while hiking. Env. & Behav., 27, 404-426.
Hull, R. B., D.P. Robertson, G.J. Buhyoff & A. Kendra, 2000. What are we hiding behind the visual buffer strip? Forest aesthetics reconsidered. Jnl. Forestry, 98:7, 34-38.
Hunziker, M., P. Felber, K. Gehring, M. Buchecker, N. Bauer & F. Kienast, 2008. Evaluation of landscape change by different social groups results of two empirical studies in Switzerland. Mountain Res. & Dev., 28:2, 140-147.
Hur, M., J.L. Nasar & B. Chun, 2009. Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived naturalness and openness. Jnl. Env. Psych. 30:1, 52–59.
Iiyama, N., M. Kamada & N. Nakagoshi, 2005. Ecological and social evaluation of landscape in a rural area with terraced paddies in southwestern Japan. Landscape & Urban Plg., 70, 3-4, 301-313.
Jacobs, K.W. & F.E. Hustmyer, 1974. Effects of four psychological primary colors on GSR, heart rate, and respiration. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 38, 763-766.
Jones, G.R., J. Ady & B.A. Gray, 1976. Scenic and recreational highway study for the State of Washington. Landscape Plg., 3:3, 151-302.
Jorgensen, J., J. Hitchmough & T. Calvert, 2002. Woodland spaces and edges: their impact on perception of safety and preference. Landscape & Urban Plg., 60:3, 135-150.
Junge, X., J. Schűpbach, T. Walter, B. Schmid & P. Lindemann-Matthies, 2015. Aesthetic quality of agricultural landscape seasonal stages Switzerland. Landscape & Urban Plg., 133, 67 – 77.
Kane, 1976. Evaluating Landscape Attractiveness – A Review of Problems and Methods, and a Technique Developed for the National Trust of South Australia. Adelaide: National Trust of SA.
Kane, P.S., 1981. Assessing landscape attractiveness: a comparative test of two new methods. Applied Geog., 1:2, 77-96.
Kaplan, R., S. Kaplan & J.S. Wendt, 1972. Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban material. Perception & Psychophysics, 12:4, 354 – 356.
Kaplan, R., 1977. Preference and everyday nature: method and application. In: Stokols, D. (Ed), Perspectives on Environment and Behavior Theory, Research and Applications, Plenum Press.
Kaplan, S., 1979. Perceptions and Landscape: Conceptions and Misconceptions. In: Elsner & Smardon (Eds), 1979.
Kaplan, R. & E.J. Herbert, 1987. Cultural and sub-cultural comparisons in preferences for natural settings. Landscape & Urban Plg., 14, 281-293.
Kaplan, R. & J.F. Talbot, 1988. Ethnicity and preference for natural settings: a review and recent findings. Landscape & Urban Plg., 15, 107 – 117.
Kaplan, R. & S. Kaplan, 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Kaufman, A.J. & V.I. Lohr, 2004. Does plant color affect emotional and physiological responses to landscapes? In: Congress: Expanding roles for horticulture, human well-being and life quality.
Kearney, A.R. & G.A. Bradley, 2011. The effects of viewer attributes for forest scenes: contributions of attitudes knowledge, demographic factors, and stakeholder group membership. Env. & Behav., 43:2, 147-181.
Kellomaki, S. & R. Savolainen, 1984. The scenic value of the forest landscape as assessed in the field and the laboratory. Landscape Plg., 11, 97-107.
Kliskey, A.D., 1994. Mapping multiple perceptions of wilderness in southern NZ, II: an alternative multivariate approach. Applied Geog., 14:4, 308–326.
Knopp, T.B., G. Ballman & L.C. Merriam, 1979. Toward a more direct measure of river user preferences. Jnl. Leisure Research, 11:4, 31- 326.
Kuper, R., 2013. Here and gone. The visual effects of seasonal changes in plant and vegetative characteristics on landscape preference criteria. Landscape Jnl., 32:1, 65-78.
Lamb, R.J. & A.T. Purcell, 1990. Perception of naturalness in landscape and its relationship to vegetation structure. Landscape & Urban Plg., 19:4, 333 – 352.
Lee, S.W., C.D. Ellis, B.S. Kweon & S.K. Hong, 2008. Relationship between landscape structure and neighborhood satisfaction in urbanized areas. Landscape & Urban Plg., 85:1, 60–70.
Lewis, J.L., 2008. Perceptions of landscape change in a rural British Columbia community. Landscape & Urban Plg., 85:1, 49-59.
Lindemann-Matthies, P., R. Briegel, B. Schüpbach & X. Junge, 2010. Aesthetic preference for a Swiss alpine landscape: the impact of different agricultural land-use with different biodiversity. Landscape & Urban Plg., 98, 99-109.
Lohr, V.I., 2007. Benefits of nature: what we are learning about why people respond to nature. Jnl. Physiological Anthropology, 26:2, 83-85.
Lothian, A., 1999. Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: Is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? Landscape & Urban Planning, 44, 177 – 198.
Lothian, A., 2000. Landscape quality assessment of South Australia, PhD Thesis, University of Adelaide.
Lothian, A., 2004. Amenity Value of Scattered and Isolated Trees. Report to the SA Native Vegetation Council.
Lothian, A., 2005a. Coastal Viewscapes of South Australia, Report for the Coast Protection Branch, SA Department for Environment and Heritage.
Lothian, A., 2005b. Barossa and Light Region Landscape Assessment Study, Report for Planning SA, Barossa Council, Light Regional Council, and the Barossa Light Regional Development Board.
Lothian, A., 2006. Measuring and mapping SA’s Coastal Scenic Quality, South Australian Geographer, 21:1, 3 – 6.
Lothian, A., 2007. Landscape quality assessment studies in South Australia, South Australian Geographical Journal, 106, 27 – 52.
Lothian, A., 2007. South Australian River Murray Landscape Assessment Project. Report for the SA Dept of Water, Land & Biodiversity Conservation and the SA Murray Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board.
Lothian, A., 2008. Visual impact assessment of some developments in South Australia, Australian Planner, 45:4, 35 – 41.
Lothian, A., 2008. Scenic perceptions of the Visual Effects of Wind Farms on South Australian Landscapes, Geographical Research, 46:2.
Lothian, A., 2009. Flinders Ranges Landscape Quality Assessment Project. Report for the SA Department for Environment and Heritage.
Lothian, A., 2012. Landscape Quality Assessment: An Alternative Approach, PQ Planning Quarterly, Journal of NZ Planning Institute, 187: 22 – 25.
Lothian, A., 2012. Lake District National Park (UK) Landscape Quality Assessment. Pro bono project in conjunction with the Lake District National Park Authority.
Lothian, A., 2015. Mount Lofty Ranges Landscape Quality Assessment Project. Pro bono project with cooperation of the World Heritage Project Committee.
Low J.F., V.A. Froude & H.G. Rennie, 2010. The nature of natural: defining natural character for the New Zealand context. New Zealand. Ecology, Jan 1:332 – 341.
Lyons, E., 1983. Demographic correlates of landscape preference. Env. & Behav., 15:4, 487 – 511.
Mace, B.L., P.A. Bell & R.J. Loomis, 1999. Aesthetic, affective, and cognitive effects of noise on natural landscape assessment. Society & Natural Resources, 12:3, 225-242.
Mandelbrot, B., 1983. The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W.H. Freeman & Co, New York.
Misgav, A., 2000. Visual preferences of the public for vegetation groups in Israel. Landscape & Urban Plg.48:3-4, 143-159.
Morgan, R., 1999. Some factors affecting coastal landscape aesthetic quality assessment. Landscape Research, 24:2, 167-184.
Mosley, M.P., 1989. Perceptions of New Zealand river scenery. New Zealand Geographer, 45:1, 2-13.
Müderrisoğlu, H., E. Eroğlu, Ş. Özkan & K. Ak, 2006. Visual perception of tree forms. Bldg & Env., 41:6, 796-806.
Nasar, J. & Yi-Hsuan Lin, 2003. Evaluative responses to five kinds of water features. Landscape Research, 28:4, 441-450.
Nasar, J. & Minhui Li, 2004. Landscape mirror: the attractiveness of reflecting water. Landscape & Urban Plg., 66, 233–238.
Nassauer, J.I. & M.K. Benner, 1984. Visual preferences for a coastal landscape including oil and gas development. Jnl. Env. Mgt., 18, 323-338.
Nassauer, J.I., 1989. Agricultural policy and aesthetic objectives. Jnl. Soil & Water Cons., 44:5, 384-387.
Nassauer, J.I., 1995. Culture and changing landscape structure. Landscape Ecology, 10:4, 229-237.
Nassauer, J.L., R.C. Corry & R.M. Cruse, 2002. The landscape in 2025: Alternative future landscape scenarios, a means to consider agricultural policy. Jnl. Soil & Water Cons., 57:2, 45-53.
Nieman, T.J., 1978. Visual quality: the attitude and perception of coastal zone user groups. In: Weidemann, S. & J.R. Anderson, (Eds), 1978.
Ode, A., M.S. Tveit & G. Fry, 2008. Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: Touching base with landscape aesthetic theory. Landscape Research, 33:1, 89-117.
Ode, A., G. Fry, M.S. Tveit, P. Messager & D. Miller, 2009. Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. Jnl. Env. Mgt., 90:1, 375 – 383.
Ode, Å, C.M. Hagerhall & N. Sang, 2010. Analyzing visual landscape complexity: Theory and application. Landscape Research, 35:1, 111 – 131.
Orland, B., 1988. Aesthetic preference for rural landscapes: some resident and visitor differences. In: Nasar, J.L., (Ed), 1988. Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Palmer, J.F. & E.H. Zube, 1976, Numerical and perceptual landscape classification. In: Zube, E.H. (Ed), 1976.
Palmer, J.F., 1978. An investigation of the conceptual classification of landscapes and its application to landscape planning issues. In: Weidemann, S. & J.R. Anderson, 1978.
Palmer, J.F., 2004. Using spatial metrics to predict scene perception in a changing landscape, Dennis, Mass. Landscape & Urban Plg., 69:2/3, 201 – 218.
Palmer, S.E. & K.B. Schloss, 2010. An ecological valence theory of human color preference. Psych & Cognitive Science, 107:19, 8877– 8882.
Palmer, S.E., K.B. Schloss & J. Sammartino, 2012. Hidden knowledge in aesthetic judgments: preferences for color and spatial composition. In: Shimamura, A.P. & S.E. Palmer (Eds), Aesthetic Science: Connecting Minds, Brains, and Experience. Oxford University Press.
Papadimitriou, F., 2012, The algorithmic complexity of landscapes. Landscape Research, 37:5, 591- 611.
Patsfall, M.R., N.R. Feimer, G.J. Buhyoff & J.D. Wellman, 1984. The prediction of scenic beauty from landscape content and composition. Jnl. Env. Psych., 4:1, 7-26.
Parsons, R. & T.C. Daniel, 1988. Assessing visibility impairment in class I parks and wilderness areas: A comparison of policy‐relevant methods. Society & Nat Resources, 1:1, 227-240.
Penning-Rowsell, E.C., 1982. A public preference evaluation of landscape quality. Reg. Studies, 16:2, 97-112.
Pentland, A., 1984. Fractal-based description of natural scenes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 661–674.
Pérez, J.G., 2002. Ascertaining landscape perceptions and preferences with pair-wise photographs: Planning rural tourism in Extremadura, Spain. Landscape Research, 27:3, 297-308.
Peron,E., A.T. Purcell, H. Staats, S. Falchero & R.J. Lamb, 1998. Models of preference for outdoor scenes: some experimental evidence. Env. & Behav., 30:3, 282-305.
Peterson, G.L. & E.S. Neumann, 1969. Modeling and predicting human response to the visual recreation environment. Jnl. Leisure Research, 1, 219-237.
Pflüger, Y., A. Rackham & S. Larned, 2010. The aesthetic value of river flows: An assessment of flow preferences for large and small rivers. Landscape & Urban Plg., 95, 68-78.
Pitt, D.G., 1976. Physical dimensions of scenic quality in streams. In: Zube, E.H., 1976.
Pomeroy, J.W., M.B. Green & J.E. FitzGibbon, 1983. Evaluation of urban riverscape aesthetics in the Canadian prairies. Jnl. Env. Mgt., 17, 263 – 276.
Prineas, T. & P.J. Allen, 1992. Queensland’s Wet Tropics World Heritage Area. Mapping the scenic quality. Landscape Aust., 3, 241 – 246.
Purcell, A.T. & R. J. Lamb, 1998. Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach. Landscape & Urban Plg., 42:1, 57-66.
Purcell, A.T., R.J. Lamb, E.M. Peron & S. Falchero, 1994. Preference or preferences for landscape? Jnl. Env. Psych., 14:3, 195-209.
Purcell, T., E. Peron & R. Berto, 2001. Why do preferences differ between scene types? Env. & Behav., 33:1, 93-106.
Rechtman, R., 2013. Visual perception of agricultural cultivated landscapes: key components as predictors of landscape preferences. Landscape Research, 38:3, 273-294.
Ribe, R., 1986. A test of uniqueness and diversity visual assessment factors using judgement‐independent measures. Landscape Research, 11:2, 13 – 15.
Ribe, R.G., 1991. The scenic impact of key forest attributes and long-term management alternatives for hardwood forests. In: L. H. McConnick & K. W. Gottschalk (Eds) Proceedings, 8th Central Hardwood Forest Conference, Gen Tech Report NE 148, University Park, Pennsylvania, March 4-6, 1991.
Ribe, R.G., 2006. Perceptions of forestry alternatives in the US Pacific Northwest: Information effects and acceptability distribution analysis. Jnl. Env. Psych., 26:2, 100 – 115.
Ribe, R.G., 2009. In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the US Pacific Northwest: The effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood. Jnl. Env. Mgt., 91, 245-260.
Ribe, R.G. & M.Y. Matteson, 2002. Views of old forestry and new among reference groups in the Pacific Northwest. Jnl. App. For., 17:4, 173-182.
Ródenas, M., F. Sancho-Royo & F. González-Bernáldez, 1975. Structure of landscape preferences – a study based on large dams viewed in their landscape setting. Landscape Plg., 2, 159-178.
Rogge, E., F. Nevens & H. Gulinck, 2007. Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders: Looking beyond aesthetics. Landscape & Urban Plg., 82:4, 159-174.
Rosenberger, R.S. & E.L. Smith, 1998. Assessing Forest Scenic Beauty Impacts of Insects and Management. Forest Service FHTET 98-08.
Ruddell, E.J., J.H. Gramann, V.A. Rudis & J.M. Westphal, 1989. The psychological utility of visual penetration in near-view forest scenic-beauty models. Env. & Behav., 21:4, 393-412.
Sang, N., D. Miller & A. Ode, 2008. Landscape metrics and visual topology in the analysis of landscape preference. Env & Plg B, 35:3, 504 – 520.
Schirpke, U., E. Tasser & U. Tappeiner, 2013. Predicting scenic beauty of mountain regions. Landscape & Urban Plg., 111, 1-12.
Schroeder, H.W. & T.C. Brown, 1983. Alternative functional forms for an inventory-based landscape perception model. Jnl. Leisure Research, 15:2, 156-163.
Schroeder, H.W. & T.C. Daniel, 1981. Progress in predicting the perceived scenic beauty of forest landscapes. Forest Science, 27:1, 71-80.
Schroeder, H.W., 1991. Preference and meaning of arboretum landscapes: Combining quantitative and qualitative data. Jnl. Env. Psych., 11:3, 231-248.
Scott, A., 2002. Assessing public perception of landscape: The LANDMAP experience. Landscape Research, 27:3, 271-295.
Shafer, E.L., J.F. Hamilton & E.A. Schmidt, 1969. Natural landscape preference: a predictive model. Jnl. Leisure Research, 1:1, 1-19.
Sherren, K., J. Fischer, J. Pink, J. Stott, J. Stein & H-J. Yoon, 2011. Australian graziers value sparse trees in their pastures: A viewshed analysis of photo-elicitation. Society & Nat Resources, 24:4, 412-422.
Shuttleworth, S., 1983. Upland landscapes and the landscape image. Landscape Research, 8:3, 7-14.
Sommer, R. & J. Summit, 1995. An exploratory study of preferred tree form. Env. & Behav., 24:4, 540-557.
Stadler B., R. Purves & M. Tomko, 2011. Exploring the relationship between land cover and subjective evaluation of scenic beauty through user generated content. 25th Int. Cartographic Conf., Paris, France, 3 – 8 July, 2011.
Stamps, A.E., 1994. Formal and nonformal stimulus factors in environmental preference. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 79, 3 – 9.
Stamps, A.E., 2002. Fractals, skylines, nature and beauty. Landscape & Urban Plg., 60:3, 163-184.
Stober, D., A. Pogačnik & S. Lončar-Vicković, 2012. Comparison of students and experts’ attitudes on planning and managing the Drava and Mura River landscape (Croatia). Technical Gazette, 19:3, 573 – 581.
Strumse, E., 1994, Perceptual dimensions in the visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway. Jnl. Env. Psych., 14:4, 281-292.
Strumse, E., 1994. Environmental attributes and the prediction of visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway. Jnl. Env. Psych., 14:4, 293-303.
Strumse, E., 1996. Demographic differences in the visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in Western Norway. Jnl. Env. Psych., 16, 17-31.
Sullivan, W.C., 1994. Perceptions of the rural-urban fringe: citizen preferences for natural and developed settings. Landscape & Urban Plg., 29, 85-101.
Summerson, R. & I.D. Bishop, 2011. Aesthetic value in Antarctica: beautiful or sublime? The Polar Jnl., 1:2, 225-250.
Tahvanainen, L., L. Tyrväinen & I. Nousiainen, 1996. Effect of afforestation on the scenic value of rural landscape. Scandinavian Jnl. For. Res., 11:1-4, 397 – 405.
Tahvanainen, L. & L. Tyrväinen, 1998. Model for predicting the scenic value of rural landscape: A preliminary study of landscape preferences in North Carelia. Scandinavian Jnl. For. Res., 13:1-4, 379-385.
Tempesta, T., 2010. The perception of agrarian historical landscapes: a study of the Veneto plain in Italy. Landscape & Urban Plg., 97. 258-272.
Treiman, E.F., D.B. Champion & M.J. Wecksung, 1979. Simulation of the visual effects of power plant plumes. In: Elsner & Smardon (Eds), 1979.
Tsunetsugu, Y., J. Leeb, B-J. Park, L. Tyrväinen, T. Kagawa, & Y. Miyazaki, 2013. Physiological and psychological effects of viewing urban forest landscapes assessed by multiple measurements. Landscape & Urban Plg., 113, 90-93.
Tunstall, S., S. Tapsel & M. House, 2004, Children’s perceptions of river landscapes and play: what children’s photographs reveal. Landscape Research, 29:2, 181-204.
Tveit, M.S., 2009. Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference. Jnl. Env. Mgt. 90:9, 2882–2888.
Ulrich, R.S., 1981. Natural versus urban scenes, some psychophysiological effects. Env. & Behav., 13:5, 523 – 556.
Uuemaa, E., M. Antrop, J. Roosaare, R. Marja & U. Mander, 2009. Landscape metrics and indices: an overview of their use in landscape research. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 3, 1 – 28.
Van den Berg, A.E. & S.L. Koole, 2006. New wilderness in the Netherlands: an investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes. Landscape & Urban Plg., 76, 362 – 372.
Van der Wal, D. Miller, J. Irvine, S. Fiorini, A. Amar, S. Yearley, R. Gill & N. Dandy, 2014. The influence of information provision on people’s landscape preferences: A case study on understorey vegetation of deer-browsed woodlands. Landscape & Urban Plg., 124, 129-139.
van Marwijk, R.B.M, B.H.M. Elands, J.K. Kampen, S. Terlouw, D.G. Pitt & P. Opdam, 2012. Public perceptions of the attractiveness of restored nature. Restoration Ecology, 20:6, 773 – 780.
van Zanten, B.RT., P.H. Verburg, M.J. Koetse & P.J.H. van Beukering, 2014. Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies. Landscape & Urban Plg., 132, 89 – 101.
Vining, J., T.C. Daniel & H.W. Schroeder, 1984. Predicting scenic values in forested residential landscapes. Jnl. Leisure Research, 16:2, 124-135.
Vodak, M.C., P.L. Roberts, J.D. Wellman & G.J. Buhyoff, 1985. Scenic impacts of eastern hardwood management. Forest Science. 31:2, 289-301.
Weidemann, S. & J.R. Anderson, (Eds), 1978. Priorities for Environmental Design Research. Environment Design Research Association.
Weinstoerffer, J. & P. Girardin, 2000. Assessment of the contribution of land use pattern and intensity to landscape quality: use of a landscape indicator. Ecol. Modeling, 130:1-3, 95 – 109.
White, M.P., D. Cracknell, A. Corcoran, G. Jenkinson & M.H. Depledge, 2014. Do preferences for waterscapes persist in inclement weather and extend to sub-aquatic scenes? Landscape Research, 39:4, 339-358.
Whitmore, W., E. Cook & F. Steiner, 1995. Public involvement in visual assessment: The Verde River Corridor study. Landscape Jnl., 14:1, 27 – 45.
Williams, K.J.H. & J. Cary, 2002. Landscape preferences, ecological quality & biodiversity protection. Env. & Behav., 34:2, 257-274.
Williamson, D.N. & J.A. Chalmers, 1982. Perceptions of Forest Scenic Quality in Northeast Victoria. A Technical Report of Research Phases 1 and 2. Forests Commission, Victoria, Melbourne.
Willis, K.G., G.D. Garrod, R. Scarpa, N. Powe, A. Lovett, I.J. Batemen, N. Hanley & D.C. Macmillan, 2003.The Social and Environmental Benefits of Forests in Great Britain. Centre for Research in Env. Appraisal & Mgt, Uni Newcastle. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.
Wilson, M.I., L.D. Robertson, M. Daly & S.A. Walton, 1995. Effects of visual cues on assessment of water quality. Jnl. Env. Psych. 15, 53 – 63.
Wu, W., 2013. Study on the value assessment and dynamic change of the dust detainment of Hangzhou scenic forestland. Research Jnl. App. Sci, Eng & Tech., 5:19, 4677-4680.
Yamashita, S. 2002. Perception and evaluation of water in landscape: use of photo-projective method to compare child and adult residents’ perceptions of a Japanese river environment. Landscape & Urban Plg.,. 62, 3–17.
Yarrow, C., 1966. A preliminary survey of the public’s concepts of amenity in British forestry. Forestry, 39. 59-67.
Zhao, J., R. Wang, Y. Cai & P. Luo, 2013. Effects of visual indicators on landscape preferences. Jnl. Urban Plg & Dev., 139:1, 70 – 78.
Zheng, B., Y. Zhang & J. Chen, 2011. Preference to home landscape: wildness or neatness? Landscape & Urban Plg., 99, 1 – 8
Zube, E.H., 1973. Rating everyday rural landscapes of the north-eastern U.S. Landscape Arch., 63:4, 370 – 375.
Zube, E.H., D. G. Pitt & T. W. Anderson, 1975. Perception and prediction of scenic resource values of the northeast. In: Zube, E.H. et al, (Eds), 1975.
Zube, E.H., R.O. Brush & J.G. Fabos (Eds), 1975. Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions and Resources. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Penn.
Zube, E.H., 1976. Studies in Landscape Perception. Institute for Man and Environment, Publication No R-76-1, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Zube, E.H., Pitt, D.G., Evans, G.W., 1983. A lifespan developmental study of landscape assessment. Jnl. Env. Psych. 3, 115–128.